The myth of bloat

_posts/2021-06-04-myth-bloat.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title:  "The Myth of Bloat"
+author: Ta180m
+tags: ["Linux", "Rant"]
+---
+
+
+If there's one thing that hardcore Linux users are ridiculously obsessed about, it's the vague and scary concept of *bloat*. You gotta keep package counts low, use [WMs](/blog/2020/12/26/why-wms-suck.html), and compile [suckless.org stuff](suckless.org/). Visit any Arch or Gentoo forum or chat, and this philosophy seems to be epidemical. But... there's a gaping problem: package count is totally irrelevant, WMs are painful to configure, and suckless.org software really sucks. Yes, it's all a load of nonsense.
+
+Let's start with the term "bloat". What does it even mean? Wikipedia offers a few definitions, such as [code bloat](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_bloat) and [software bloat](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_bloat) which are definitely legitimate issues. However, this obsession with bloat seems to be about something different; an allergic aversion to any software that's sufficiently complex.
+
+What about package counts?
+
+![Wise words](/blog/assets/package-count.png)
+
+It's actually really easy to get a very low package count: just install Windows and you can brag about having zero packages installed. Beat that!
+
+Enough said about package count; The issue with WMs and other supposedly "minimalistic" software is that *it's simply worse than its alternatives unless you use are purely optimizing for metrics like lowest number of lines of code.* Holistically, they're just... worse.
+
+Well, that was quite the rant.
+