update intro
This commit is contained in:
parent
293b77981f
commit
7ea68ac2bb
2 changed files with 13 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
slug: /intro/reading-editorials
|
||||
title: When to Read Editorials
|
||||
author: Nathan Wang
|
||||
title: When to Read Editorials (Analyses)
|
||||
author: Nathan Wang ++
|
||||
order: 4
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -10,16 +10,18 @@ is challenging. Below are the opinions of various individuals.
|
|||
|
||||
<!-- END DESCRIPTION -->
|
||||
|
||||
Note that "give up" is in quotes, because one still learns when they "give up"
|
||||
and read an editorial!
|
||||
Note that "give up" is in quotes, because one still learns when they "give up" and read an editorial!
|
||||
|
||||
## Benjamin Qi
|
||||
|
||||
> I usually read editorials after 1 second, so I can find what wrong solution the authors have because if I can't solve a problem in 1 second it's broken
|
||||
If you're still coming up with new ideas, keep thinking. Otherwise, you have several options:
|
||||
- Look at [part of] the solution. (If CodeForces, look at the tags.)
|
||||
- Leave it for a while and do something else if you actually want to solve it on your own.
|
||||
- Get a hint from someone else.
|
||||
|
||||
/s
|
||||
I'm impatient, so usually I go with the first option. Sometimes I end up reading an editorial before reading the statement, but idk if this is a good strategy. :/
|
||||
|
||||
@benqorz
|
||||
In any case, if you thought about a problem a lot during a contest but didn't end up solving it, then I don't see any reason not to read the editorial when it comes out (vs. continuing to think about it on your own). Also, you should always implement the solution afterwards!
|
||||
|
||||
## William Lin
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ Helpful Links!!
|
|||
|
||||
<!-- END DESCRIPTION -->
|
||||
|
||||
Use [clist.by](https://clist.by/coder/bqi343/) to track your progress!
|
||||
|
||||
### Lists
|
||||
|
||||
* [USACO Resources Page](http://www.usaco.org/index.php?page=resources)
|
||||
|
@ -19,6 +21,7 @@ Helpful Links!!
|
|||
* [Competitive Programmer's Handbook (CPH)](https://cses.fi/book/book.pdf)
|
||||
* The [problemset](https://cses.fi/problemset/) (now at 200 problems) is quite good!
|
||||
* [Guide to Competitive Programming](https://www.amazon.com/Guide-Competitive-Programming-Algorithms-Undergraduate/dp/3319725467) is a paid book based off CPH
|
||||
* Can currently download PDF [for free](https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-72547-5)!
|
||||
* Competitive Programming Book (Steven, Felix)
|
||||
* [Competitive Programming Book 1](http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~stevenha/myteaching/competitive_programming/cp1.pdf) is freely available but old
|
||||
* [Competitive Programming 4](https://cpbook.net/) is the latest edition of the book (with significant additions) but costs money.
|
||||
|
@ -30,7 +33,7 @@ Helpful Links!!
|
|||
### Courses
|
||||
|
||||
* [Competitive Programming Course (SuprDewd)](https://github.com/SuprDewd/T-414-AFLV)
|
||||
* [Algorithms Pt 1 (and Pt 2)](https://www.coursera.org/learn/algorithms-part1)
|
||||
* [Cousera Algorithms Pt 1 (and Pt 2)](https://www.coursera.org/learn/algorithms-part1)
|
||||
* [Carnegie-Mellon ICPC](https://contest.cs.cmu.edu/295/f17/)
|
||||
* [VPlanet](https://vplanetcoding.com/)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Reference in a new issue