From ce5ee7f3361c7a42376864a29309cd6e14ecce64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anthony Wang Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 19:19:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix more typos --- content/posts/spelling-reform-np-hard.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/posts/spelling-reform-np-hard.md b/content/posts/spelling-reform-np-hard.md index 1f3215a..3cf3365 100644 --- a/content/posts/spelling-reform-np-hard.md +++ b/content/posts/spelling-reform-np-hard.md @@ -112,14 +112,14 @@ If `b` is set to true: ##CbA## ``` -If both `a` and `b` are set to true. +If both `a` and `b` are set to true: ``` abc ##Cba## ``` -Magic! Yeah, not really. Basically, if none of the variables are true, then the edit distances is 7, and if at least one is true, then it drops down to 6. The reversed order of the letters in the phonetic pronunciation is to ensure that setting multiple variables to true does not make the edit distance even smaller. If the order wasn't reversed, then that last example would look like this: +Magic! Well, it's not really magic after you work through all the cases. Basically, if none of the variables are true, then the edit distances is 7, and if at least one is true, then it drops down to 6. The reversed order of the letters in the phonetic pronunciation is to ensure that setting multiple variables to true does not make the edit distance even smaller. If the order wasn't reversed, then that last example would look like this: ``` abc