5.5 KiB
id | title | author |
---|---|---|
time-comp | Time Complexity | Darren Yao, Benjamin Qi |
In programming contests, there is a strict limit on program runtime. This means that in order to pass, your program needs to finish running within a certain timeframe.
For USACO, this limit is 4
seconds for Java submissions. A conservative estimate for the number of operations the grading server can handle per second is 10^8
(but could be closer to 5 \cdot 10^8
given good constant factors).
Complexity Calculations
We want a method of how many operations it takes to run each algorithm, in terms of the input size n
. Fortunately, this can be done relatively easily using Big O Notation, which expresses worst-case complexity as a function of n
as n
gets arbitrarily large. Complexity is an upper bound for the number of steps an algorithm requires as a function of the input size. In Big O notation, we denote the complexity of a function as O(f(n))
, where f(n)
is a function without constant factors or lower-order terms. We'll see some examples of how this works, as follows.
The following code is O(1)
, because it executes a constant number of operations.
int a = 5;
int b = 7;
int c = 4;
int d = a + b + c + 153;
Input and output operations are also assumed to be O(1)
.
In the following examples, we assume that the code inside the loops is O(1)
.
The time complexity of loops is the number of iterations that the loop runs. For example, the following code examples are both O(n)
.
for(int i = 1; i <= n; i++){
// constant time code here
}
int i = 0;
while(i < n){
// constant time node here
i++;
}
Because we ignore constant factors and lower order terms, the following examples are also O(n)
:
for(int i = 1; i <= 5*n + 17; i++){
// constant time code here
}
for(int i = 1; i <= n + 457737; i++){
// constant time code here
}
We can find the time complexity of multiple loops by multiplying together the time complexities of each loop. This example is O(nm)
, because the outer loop runs O(n)
iterations and the inner loop O(m)
.
for(int i = 1; i <= n; i++){
for(int j = 1; j <= m; j++){
// constant time code here
}
}
In this example, the outer loop runs O(n)
iterations, and the inner loop runs anywhere between 1 and n iterations (which is a maximum of n
). Since Big O notation calculates worst-case time complexity, we must take the factor of n
from the inner loop. Thus, this code is O(n^2)
.
for(int i = 1; i <= n; i++){
for(int j = i; j <= n; j++){
// constant time code here
}
}
If an algorithm contains multiple blocks, then its time complexity is the worst time complexity out of any block. For example, the following code is O(n^2)
.
for(int i = 1; i <= n; i++){
for(int j = 1; j <= n; j++){
// constant time code here
}
}
for(int i = 1; i <= n + 58834; i++){
// more constant time code here
}
The following code is O(n^2 + nm)
, because it consists of two blocks of complexity O(n^2)
and O(nm)
, and neither of them is a lower order function with respect to the other.
for(int i = 1; i <= n; i++){
for(int j = 1; j <= n; j++){
// constant time code here
}
}
for(int i = 1; i <= n; i++){
for(int j = 1; j <= m; j++){
// more constant time code here
}
}
Common Complexities and Constraints
Complexity factors that come from some common algorithms and data structures are as follows:
- Mathematical formulas that just calculate an answer:
O(1)
- Unordered set/map:
O(1)
per operation - Binary search:
O(\log n)
- Ordered set/map or priority queue:
O(\log n)
per operation - Prime factorization of an integer, or checking primality or compositeness of an integer naively:
O(\sqrt{n})
- Reading in
n
items of input:O(n)
- Iterating through an array or a list of
n
elements:O(n)
- Sorting: usually
O(n \log n)
for default sorting algorithms (mergesort, for exampleCollections.sort
orArrays.sort
on objects) - Java Quicksort
Arrays.sort
function on primitives:O(n^2)
- on pathological worst-case data sets, don't use this in CodeForces rounds
- Iterating through all subsets of size
k
of the input elements:O(n^k)
. For example, iterating through all triplets isO(n^3)
. - Iterating through all subsets:
O(2^n)
- Iterating through all permutations:
O(n!)
Here are conservative upper bounds on the value of n
for each time complexity. You can probably get away with more than this, but this should allow you to quickly check whether an algorithm is viable.
n |
Possible complexities |
---|---|
n \le 10 |
O(n!) , O(n^7) , O(n^6) |
n \le 20 |
O(2^n \cdot n) , O(n^5) |
n \le 80 |
O(n^4) |
n \le 400 |
O(n^3) |
n \le 7500 |
O(n^2) |
n \le 7 \cdot 10^4 |
O(n \sqrt n) |
n \le 5 \cdot 10^5 |
O(n \log n) |
n \le 5 \cdot 10^6 |
O(n) |
n \le 10^{18} |
O(\log^2 n) , O(\log n) , O(1) |
Other Resources
- CPH 2