Discontinue using either Performance Co-Pilot or Zabbix for monitoring

a commented

2021-12-26 23:44:38 +00:00

Owner

We currently have both Performance Co-Pilot and Zabbix set up for monitoring. We're considering to uninstall one of them, but we're not sure which one. Zabbix is heavier but has more features, many of which we don't use. Currently the Grafana-Zabbix integration is broken but we haven't tried integrating PCP with Grafana yet.

a added the

question

enhancement

help wanted

labels 2021-12-26 23:44:38 +00:00

a added this to the (deleted) project 2021-12-26 23:44:38 +00:00

a commented

2021-12-27 02:25:26 +00:00

Author

Owner

I think we'll go with something like sar or atop since those are extremely lightweight.

I think we'll go with something like `sar` or `atop` since those are extremely lightweight.

a commented

2021-12-27 03:15:00 +00:00

Author

Owner

We're discontinuing Zabbix at least since it's way too heavy.

a commented

2021-12-27 03:44:05 +00:00

Author

Owner

We'll just stick with using Performance Co-Pilot since it's well integrated with Cockpit and doesn't use much resources. Also I wasted way too much time on this issue.

a closed this issue

2021-12-27 03:44:05 +00:00

Discontinue using either Performance Co-Pilot or Zabbix for monitoring #85